. An ideal example of this would be Curley when he decides to target Lennie as a'frustration' and subsequently attacks him with no real valid reason apart from jealousy and spite. Lennie depends upon his friendship with George to make the… 973 Words 4 Pages Introduction: I. Candy shows loyalty when he tells Miss Curley that he would stick up on Crooks behalf if she tried to lie and yell rape. Steinbeck does this to symbolise that the inhabitants had to cope with the depressing reality of the effects of the Great Depression as they were living in it. Let's contextualize this, Shmoopers: when George kills Lennie, it's a kind of , or mercy killing.
Maybe he was born that way but that we do not know. If them other guys gets in jail they can rot for all anybody gives a damn. Jim's watch was given to him by his father and has been in his family for many years. Suicide and mental illness sets in. This society manifests more than profit-motivated relationships, because it also depicts a damaging patriarchal culture. However their attitudes toward women may be tied to their dissatisfying life, the views expressed on the subject have every reason to give the modern reader pause.
The issues of labor disputes, unemployment, war, discrimination, and the like were evident of this literary approach. George is taking care of him becase Lenny's Aunt Clara died. George tells them that Lennie had the stolen gun, and that he, George, had gotten it away from him and then killed him. Curley's wife also spends her days hounded by her mean-spirited husband; her attempts to reach out to the other men backfire and win her the not undeserved reputation of a flirt. When making tough decisions in life, we should keep in mind that things happen for a reason and God may be testing us when he forces us to choose between right and wrong. In the same year of his graduation from highschool, he took steps to enter Stanford University, where he was periodically employed to many jobs.
This episode has two sides. We also learn that Lennie likes to pet soft animals, such as mice and puppies, which he often kills by mistake! When Crooks tells Miss Curley to leave his room Miss Curley threatens that she can get him linched. Tragedy occurs when obsessions come in clash with dreams. Like a barn type thing? Both novels gained nominal success. Curley is a person, who abused power for his sake; who believed that because he had the advantages in life, he can dictate his will to others. The characters are composites to a certain extent. Lennie was always involved in acts that can be considered not normal.
She expressed to the readers that even though people can be lonely, we all establish and show that we have our own humanity. In all essence, the book is a story of weak and strong people, and follows the quote from the poem exactly. The way they treat Crooks in the book shows the racism of the characters and how the different races act with one another. Candy's immediate attachment to George and Lennie's plan to settle on a farm of their own can be seen as a natural emotional progression following his loss - he looks for new companionship, now that he has lost his poor dog. They can knuckle down, work hard, keep a positive frame of mind and try earnestly to improve their standard of living. Lenny didn't know it was a bad thing.
The novel is a description of life, real situated life. George holds a moral power in the book as well as he both coddles and manipulates Lennie into behaving appropriately. Lennie pets … the pup too hard and breaks its neck. Take for example the case of Lennie and George. Of Mice and Men can teach people valuable life lessons about the affects someone can cause towards unique individuals. She uses her power to flirt with other ranch hands to make her husband jealous even though she was in ingenuous person. Two days later we find Lennie alone in a barn, with a puppy he had accidentally killed.
He represents the role of black people in society in California in 1937 during the depression. It is near the mouth of the Cayster river, 3 miles from the western coast of Asia Minor, and opposite the island of Samos. However, during the Great Depression, the idea of human companionship was drowned out by the lonely road that many men walked in search of jobs. These two characters are presented as opposites in regards to moral power. If the novel fails its background, then it does not represent reality but clear manipulation of reality itself. Since living outside the norm is considered criminal, being outside the norm results in social and sometimes physical, alienation, verbal abuse, and a loss of autonomy.
Candy felt like he neglected his moral responibility to his own dog. Here are some key events, although there are many more: -George and Lennie stop at a pool by the Salinas river. The characters in the novel basically have three options in which they can live their lives. The value of dreams and goals are that they provide hope and the desire to keep going in life, rather than laying down to die. The relationship between George and Lennie confirms that being friends with someone can be full of responsibilities and challenges. The book is not only a literary piece; it is an exposition to the realities of life, realities that are not isolated from the effects of timely events. George could have proved that he loved Lennie and cared for him by fleeing with him, even if it meant putting his own life on the line.
That put him in the situation of power addiction and overconfidence. God may have been testing George by making Lennie the way he did so that he could see if George really loved Lennie. George gets companionship, and he also gets a chance to dream. The decade of the 1930s was indeed a time of depression; desperation consumed people and they turned against each other, no longer looking out for anybody but oneself. Within this classic, Steinbeck addresses the correlation that existed between loneliness and the unattainable American dream, demonstrating the distinctive and unique idea illuminated in Of Mice and Men. George's decision to kill lennie 106 3. The one man who could serve as a nonjudgmental companion cannot coexist safely with others.