Bruce Friedman, a blogger who Carr used as an example pointed out that blog post which are over three pages is too much to absorb and which is what Carr and other researchers have experienced p316. Carr purpose of writing this piece was to inform readers that technology has an effect on us whether you want to believe or not. Words: 442 - Pages: 2. To begin his essay Carr starts off with an example from Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odysseys. Look around electronics are everyplace and invariably being upgraded. He does this multiple times in his essay, which makes it a convincing, well-written essay.
Early in the essay, Carr suggests that he is having trouble reading. Is Google Making Us Stupid? Carr debusses the fact he is a bit paranoid and I agree with that, I also appreciate the fact that as a writer Carr knows his limits and knows that the essay and ideas he are presenting are bias. I believe technology is in fact hurting us in some categories, but ultimately I believe that it is ultimately helping us grow as people and improving society as a whole. They help us learn things and they help us create things. If this trend goes on, then we as humans are putting ourselves at greater risks of not been able to fully realize and utilize the power of our brains, i. Our information recalling ability might have declined but our ability for remembering where to find forgotten information is increasing. Google´s success is not only in its technology and the functionality of its product; it´s also in its aggressive ability to get profits innovating, which is critical to their workforce because it operates in a global market.
Since the start of Google, it has been a tremendous time for Internet surfers. Risk is an opportunity-without taking risks, one cannot conquer an opportunity. Nicholas Carr backs up his claims with personal experience, personal opinions, quoting authorities, and referring to research that has been done on the topic. When you ask a question with such great magnitude the reader has a hard time not to investigate. Words: 1187 - Pages: 5. One example that he spoke about the. Is Google making us stupid analysis makes us skeptical of some of the information that he has provided.
He relates his own experiences to his other literary friends who in turn have similarly alarming symptoms. Knowing this, if someday in the future all power fails along with the internet and technology we rely on, we may begin to regress backwards and forget about the habitual use of the internet. In the 1890s, this ideology was shifted into an electronic medium where the telegram has already come into existence. John Austin, an academic dean at St. The more our society becomes reliant on engineering.
Carr described how the web is structured to make money for certain people how critical thinking skills and attention spans are ignored in the process. Carr gives credit to the web for making research which initially used to take days available in a matter of minutes Carr, 2010. Since the dawn of technology, the concern about the effects it had on the human mind has always been present. We could use the internet to look for the required knowledge and help anytime we needed. Carr explains how we think less profoundly and rely on speedy facts.
Google, Wikipedia, online databases, and school libraries are all being put on the internet to serve accessible information. Not only did he feel this way but other credible sources did too. Thereby, how do they know if it is good for us? Words: 749 - Pages: 3. Nonetheless, he wrote a very convincing and interesting persuasive essay, it sparks discussion and personal thinking as well. We no longer, as he points out from his experience try to deal with complex notions and difficult texts. The victims are the former mother and father in laws of Mr. However, the most intriguing question is, should we seek to have our processing speed increased or improved? He thinks by using the internet so much, we will become more and more objective and quick thinkers, and ultimately emotionless computers.
I believe that Google is holding. It is till being critiqued by the older generation and those who are advocates for our not changing, but our new generations are growing up with it. Afterwards, Carr claims that it has a large distraction on our mind, and we even cannot concentrate on a long reading material. Also it is much easier to relate with friends in a continuous manner. He needed something else to give his ideas credibility, if not who would listen? What rewards did they offer.
In this introduction he covers numerous controversial issues, which range from the economy and society to politics and the environment. Words: 1171 - Pages: 5. They want to make it a place where people can find exactly what they are looking for in a quick and easy manner. He pulls from credible professors and studies to back up his claims. If you were born in the early 90s or before.
Carr is of the opinion that concertation and deeper contemplation is what people are giving. Because of being human beings, we are more important to make our decision properly for the sake of ourselves, our families, our villages, our towns, our country, and finally of our world as a whole. He explains how his mind has become much more erratic since his use of the internet. This necessitates the idea of improving our brains or having them replaced with better and highly efficient ones. This text is an article by Nicholas Carr. This can be found by analyzing some of the examples that he gives, and how he seems almost nervous about what the future holds. Since my audience is the instructor and my classmates, Google helps you find information that you need for your daily life in college.
At the beginning of the article, the writer uses a very catchy hook to draw the reader. Is Google Making Us Stupid? In this quote Carr is conscious that major change has happen throughout his lifetime on how information is accessed. Furthmore, it is important to know how the company operate in different markets in the world. However, currently, Google and its compatriots in the field of technology wants us to believe that ambiguity is but a bug which needs to be fixed. The article was posted on www. What were the pledge amounts. It adds a better understanding of the information.