Put your review aside for a few days and then look at it with fresh eyes. Do you want to be a book reviewer? They describe the major plot, characters, and central theme of the book. Paradoxically, your understanding of the author depends on your deliberate detachment from the story itself to discover those traces. Generally, you should try to find a relatively recent work of about 200-350 pages on some aspect of the course that particularly interests you. The reader is taken on a journey through the world of aviation and receives first-hand accounts from the inventors and dreamers who made it possible. Then, open your review with an introduction that includes the author's background as well as the main points you'll be making. A book report should include your evaluation of whether the author succeeded in his purpose.
Pay attention to details you might have missed the first time around. Compare the evidence cited and argumentation used to support the respective conclusions. The summary should consist of a discussion and highlights of the major arguments, features, trends, concepts, themes, ideas, and characteristics of the book. Deciding how good each thing is will help you come to a more accurate conclusion. If you're reviewing a scholarly text or work of nonfiction, you might discuss whether it would be most appropriate for readers who are new to the subject or established experts in the field. An example Losing Joe's Place by Gordon Korman book review by Mr.
Analyze the different components that came together in the movie as you watch. Your thesis should inform the audience about the main idea of your report. Has she persuasively argued the thesis to your satisfaction? Do you like acting that's realistic or acting that's wild and nutty? Whether or not the special effects, if any, are believeable or enjoyable. Patterns in film can say a lot about the movie without being too blunt, so it can be interesting to see how your opinion of a movie changes when you realize what some of these patterns are trying to accomplish. Do not introduce new material at this point.
You could treat your review like a formal college essay, but it's more interesting if you make it your own. But how to get to these regions remained a problem. Once you have summarized the book and discussed the main themes and aspects, shift into your critical analysis. Watch it one more time. How does this book relate to or follow from the previous work of the author? Relate your argument to other books or authors: Support your argument for or against the author's opinions by bringing in other authors you agree with. Re read and revise your review.
End the piece by restating your overall evaluation of the book. You might want to take the major organizing themes of the book and use them to organize your own discussion. History, for example, might be organized either chronologically or around central issues. The wise men meditated, thought. The final chapters also happen to be among the few in the collection that appear for the first time and, therefore, reflect the author's most recent views on Caribbean society.
You can also choose to bring the characters in while summarizing the plot. However, thoughtful pieces without numbers are equally common, and are often a better way to give a nuanced review. A great movie review can be a work of art in its own right. It is also the part where you choose to recommend this book or not. After having written up your analyses of each of these topics, you are ready to compose your review. This will tell the reader how the work fits into the historiography of the subject and whether it is presenting a major new interpretation.
While the chapters create neatly parceled packages, certain areas seem forced to conform to the ten-chapter plan. Identify the assumptions made by the author in both the approach to and the writing of the book. College students are supposed to be more experienced than the high school ones, so the introductory part of the book review should be more varied and informative. Do they clarify or extend points made in the text? Close with a direct comment on the book, and tie together issues raised in the review. How accurate is the information? As well, if the book is part of a series, you can mention this to potential readers and situate the book within the series. Any patterns that may be developing as the plot unfolds.
As a rule, your instructor provides the necessary additional requirements in the assignment sheet. Biographical sources such as the Biography Center in the GaleNet database will help you find this information. While it can certainly 3 or more editorial reviews, sometimes you won't need quite so many. Give your review at least one editorial pass, and maybe two or three, before you consider it to be editorially sound. Do not introduce new material in your conclusion or discuss a new idea or impression that was not examined in your introduction and body paragraphs. Make sure that you are judging the book that the author actually wrote, not complaining that the author should have written a different book.
Those are all items you can examine and decide if they are well or poorly done. Include some background to enable readers to place the book into context. Typically, a college book report format does not differ greatly from the traditional essay format: 1-inch margins, 10 or 12pt font, and title page. Often the preface contain s such information. These are suggestions, not holy writ! As a scholar you stand in judgment over the text.
Read on for another quiz question. Focus on weaving a description of the book's setting, narrative voice, and plot within a critical analysis. For example, someone reviewing a work entitled War in the Falklands would have little difficulty pointing out that this account of the 1982 war between Britain and Argentina is pro-British, containing little information about the Argentine politicians, participants, and purposes. How did the thesis compare with other course material? Conduct a Contextual Analysis of the Book A or term paper for a book review requires you to do a detailed review of the book in terms of its cultural, historical and political aspects. Describe and evaluate You are expected to describe the book, that is, to summarize some major points of interest, and to evaluate it, that is, to make judgments about it. The review conveys an opinion, supporting it with evidence from the book. One offers an overview of colonization and slavery in Central America and the other two concentrate on Belize.